Here are four ways Tina Peters’ rights as an American were violated in the effort to put her in prison for nine years.
Guest post by Martel Maxim
In order to see and understand the travesty of justice Tina Peters experienced since 2021, one must consider the timeframe and political climate during the Biden regime.
During the entirety of the Biden administration, America was under attack by captured institutions. As a result of the Biden era tyranny, free speech was rapidly becoming a thing of the past as President Trump was facing a possible 700 years in prison, ~1500 J6 Patriots were locked up, Tulsi Gabbard was put on a “no fly list”, and so much more.
However, at present the downward disintegration of our Constitutional rights are being reversed via enactment of lawful policies under President Trump in accordance with the Constitution. However, Tina Peters is still suffering from that corrupt era of lawfare that attempted to ruin her life in order to shut her up.
Looking back it looks like Judge Barrett had no problem violating the Constitution in at least 4 major ways in order to silence her from speaking out about the methods of stolen elections that she encountered.
Why was Judge Barrett in concert with the Colorado Governor, SOS, AG, DA’s etc.? Because they as part of the Deep State never dreamed President Trump would make a comeback and reverse the intense damage they collectively did to America. Because of this comeback, the story of Tina Peters must be exposed as a critical part of fixing America in order to save it from the extinction it faced.
How ironic that the chief tool of the Deep State has been stolen elections since the early 2000s, when the use of maliciously programmed electronic voting machines were ushered into use. When one begins to understand the importance and magnitude of the voting machine fraud evidence Tina Peters exposed, only then can the absurd conviction and imprisonment of her be understood. Visit https://tinapeters.us/ for the entire true story.
Make no mistake about it, from the moment Tina came on the scene after the stolen Grand Junction Municipal election in 2021, she was framed as a criminal. With the strength of God deep within her, she survived the harsh undeserved fall from freedom into incarceration.
Here are the 4 ways it appears Judge Barrett violated her Constitutional rights in order to silence her:
1 The first violation was discussed in detail within THIS RECENT ARTICLE, and is the main focus of Judge Varholak’s consideration for possibly ruling soon that Tina’s First Amendment right of Free Speech was destroyed by Judge Barrett.
Her denial of Bail was due to his twisted logic exhibited during her sentencing. Here are his words:
So the damage that is caused and continues to be caused is just as bad, if not worse, than the physical violence that this court sees on an all too regular basis.
Well, it just may turn out to be that Judge Barrett’s words were more damaging than physical violence. By the way, because of Judge Barrett’s ‘speech’ during her sentencing, Tina has had to endure multiple physical attacks, in addition to significant verbal threats on a regular basis from convicted real criminals she’s forced to be with, including murderers.
While this First Amendment breach was discussed in full via court filings by her attorneys, violations of the 8th, 9th and 14th Amendments of the Constitution have been identified in an Amicus Brief filed on behalf of over 3000 people nationwide, and was accepted for consideration by Judge Varholak during Tina’s hearing on 16 October 2025.
Incidentally, although these cited Constitutional violations are centered around Tina Peters, they’re actually reflective of every US Citizen, because if they can do it to her, they can do it to all of us. This is why Tina’s case is so emblematic, as the cancer of Constitutional Rights violations went rampant during the Biden years, and still remains a rising tide that remains a threat to every US Citizen unless it is corrected. NOW IS THE TIME.
2. Regarding the three other apparent Constitutional violations identified in the Amicus Brief, next is the 8th Amendment, which should have protected Tina from having her possibility of bail turned against her as an illegal punishment. The purpose of bail is to insure the accused returns as directed by a Judge to face their next stage of justice. If one skips on their posted bail and doesn’t return as directed, then that’s an additional complication the accused would have to deal with. The bottom line is that a Judge’s denial of bail should never be used as a weapon to inflict misery on the accused, which Judge Barrett certainly did to Tina Peters over this last year.
3 Next is the 9th Amendment violation by Judge Barrett, and centers around UNENUMERATED RIGHTS. When he stated “Every effort to undermine the integrity of our elections and the public’s trust in our institutions has been made by you“, he was essentially saying she had no right to express her opinion on the subject. That preemptive ‘gagging’ without a court order crossed the line of control with false Constitutional ‘authority’. Apparently Judge Barrett needs to take a class or two on the US Constitution, and abandon his following of the Soviet Constitution.
4 Finally, the 14th Amendment apparent violation raised in the Amicus brief addresses the concept of ‘the cart before the horse’. In other words, although her sentencing was a serious matter, the safeguard of the intent of the Appeal system was trashed by immediately locking her up while ‘Due Process’ was still in effect until her Appeal could be heard. In Colorado, that’s currently roughly between 1.5 to 3 years.
Therefore, on October 3rd 2024 when she was sent directly to prison, it was without basis or authority, and it was predicated that her speech was likely even more dangerous than physical violence. Here it is again in Judge Barrett’s own words, integrating the First Amendment violation along with the 9th Amendment violation:
So the damage that is caused and continues to be caused is just as bad, if not worse, than the physical violence that this court sees on an all too regular basis (First Amendment). And it’s particularly damaging when those words come from someone who holds a position of influence like you(9th Amendment).
Per Judge Varholak’s own words during the October 16th Hearing, it maters not whether the words of anyone are true or false, all that matters is whether or not those words can likely incite violence.
After all these years, nothing that Tina Peters ever disclosed led to an ounce of violence, unless of course we count the violence done against her while in prison, in addition to the malicious slander and abuse she has suffered since 2021. During these years leading up to prison, even strangers came up to her in public and threatened her, along with untold number of phone call threats, many severe. Because of this, denial of Bond to let her remain free until her appeal appears to be criminally flawed on four core Constitutional Issues.
Finally, there are other areas that need to be explored, such as the Court maneuvered methods employed to deny her from putting on a true and adequate defense. If she had been allowed that right which was severely violated, it’s likely that she would have never been sent to prison. Add to that the numerous prosecution witnesses who intentionally bore false witness against her in order to protect themselves from being charged.
It’s easy to understand why they maliciously sent her to prison however, because the truth Tina exposed was the Deep State’s worst nightmare. That coupled with the 2024 election being only a month away from her sentencing, in their own words, they needed to make an example of her in order to keep election clerks everywhere scared from questioning their election systems.
Per DA Rubinstein’s own words before her sentencing:
“I do think that clerks and recorders around the country or people running for clerk and recorder will pay attention. I’m certainly hoping that whatever the outcome is, which is very discretionary with the judge, will send that message.”.
You can read the entire article HERE.
While Tina awaits Judge Varholak’s ruling to return the rule of real law to her situation, she’s following inner direction to abstain from food until the Court’s decision is received. Anyone who’s able to join her is welcome, and is invited to indicate so in the comments that she will perhaps soon see.
Tina Peters is a National Hero who was deliberately treated as a criminal in order to cover the tracks of the real criminals who were willing to violate the Constitution in order to silence her.
The post Four Ways Tina Peters’ Constitutional Rights Were Violated in the Effort to Imprison Her for Nine Years appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.